Notable Changes into the Enforcement Rules associated with Korean Patent Act

  1. Homepage
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Notable Changes into the Enforcement Rules associated with Korean Patent Act

Notable Changes into the Enforcement Rules associated with Korean Patent Act

Notable Changes into the Enforcement Rules associated with Korean Patent Act

KIPO (the Korean Intellectual Property Office) has promulgated some brand new Enforcement guidelines through the Korean Patent Act ("KPA"), effective March 30, 2020. The enforcement that is new earn some modifications to Korean patent practice such as for instance leisure of formality demands for Korean patent actions, patent markings, and 3rd party challenges regarding pending patent applications. A number of the changes that are notable talked about below:

Formality Needs Relaxed For Korean Patent Applications - Making It Simpler To Acquire Priority Date

Presently, you can easily file a patent application in Korea with just the specification and minus the claims. Article 42-2 KPA. The applicant will then have fourteen months from filing the application that is original prepare the claims. Nonetheless, to be able to register minus the claims, the specification needed seriously to satisfy other formality demands e.g., include name of innovation, high tech, brief description of drawings, detail by detail description regarding the embodiments, etc. consequently, although a patent application could possibly be filed without claims (just like US provisional applications), certain requirements about the specification remained burdensome.

The amended Enforcement Rules for the Korean Patent Act ("Amended Rules") reduces the formality demands when it comes to specification. Underneath the Amended guidelines, the specification can be replaced with any publication that merely identifies the applicant’s innovation. As an example, an article that is academic a research note can be enough. In addition, the present KPA permits the initial specification to be filed in English. Which means an english article that is academic research paper don't need to be translated into Korean during the time of filing. Therefore, a concern date are available with considerably less expenses.

But, a job candidate who obtains a concern date without filing any claims or utilizing a spanish specification must register the claims and/or the Korean translation within fourteen months for the priority date that is earliest. Failure to take action can lead to the patent application being thought to have already been withdrawn.

Patent Marking Demands

In Korea, patent marking isn't needed to receive damages. The patentee can look for damages through the patent grant date (set alongside the United States where damages are determined from date of real or constructive knowledge). As being a practical matter, in Korea, patent marking can be used mainly for advertising purposes, which can be utilized at the patentee's option (in place of a formal appropriate advantage).

Article 223 associated with the KPA provides some demands or guidelines regarding how exactly to mark something using the patent quantity ( e.g., by indicating "Patent" or "Method Patent" together with all the patent number(s) or by indicating "Patent Application (under assessment)" or " Method application that is patentunder assessment)" alongside the patent application number(s)). Additionally, Article 121 for the Enforcement Rules for the KPA permits digital marking, i.e., marking of an item with a hyperlink to a webpage showing the menu of relevant patents and patent applications.

Now, Article 121 of Amended Rules provides more guidelines that are specific. As an example, Article 121 associated with the Amended Rules stipulates that "Patent" or "Method Patent" found in patent markings might be labeled in English (including abbreviation that is english or Chinese. More over, a club code or code that is QR be properly used as a method for digital marking. Further, Article 121 associated with the Amended Rule stipulates exactly how to mark the termination for the patent right and sets forth sanctions for false marking (patent marking/indications that could mislead consumers into convinced that a write-up is included in a patent if you find no granted patent/pending application). Particularly, the Amended Rule stipulates that when the marking/indications are believed as false marking, the Korea Intellectual Property Protection Agency ("KIPPA") may suggest appropriate corrective measures such as for example removal and modification associated with the false marking. Furthermore, if you have failure to conform to the corrective measures, the KIPPA may register a unlawful issue in conformity with all the Criminal Procedure Act. Violators can be susceptible to imprisonment up to 3 years or a superb of as much as thirty million Korean Won (about USD 27,000).

Third Party Challenges to Pending Patent Applications

A third party may submit information challenging pending applications while it is being examined at KIPO under Article 63-2 of the KPA. The distribution may contain, for instance, previous art sources and/or a short on technical and legalities to aid the examiner's understanding. Even though basic training is the fact that patentee doesn't get the challenger’s distribution, the challenger continues to be necessary to reveal their identification into the submission. As a result, numerous challengers have used a straw man whenever publishing challenges to help keep their identities private.

The Amended Rules eliminates the requirement of challengers to reveal their identities. Therefore, challengers not any longer need certainly to make use of straw man whenever patent that is challenging.

Author Avatar

About Author

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquat enim ad minim veniam. Eascxcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt.

Add Comments